It would be helpful to be able to do everything from one spot. It has looked pretty much the same for 15 years or so. They only detect if there is a malicious email or a threat and they remove it." "The UI is definitely one area of improvement because it doesn't match other interfaces and the navigation can be a little clunky." "The interface is dated. They don't do anything about MITRE attacks. That's something that Cisco ESA on the cloud doesn't have. I don't know if it is an issue on our side or if these features of the solution are not working very well." "We have Microsoft and we have the E5 licenses, they have more EDR responses on certain emails. They have a technology called Outbreak but it doesn't work as well as we would like." "We have been struggling in the last month with Cisco encryption and with the S/MIME encryption. The sensors are not that good and the rules sets are unclear." "They can do it better with web links, with the URLs. That is one challenge." "The Forged Email Detection feature needs improvement, particularly with domain.
#Fortimail uri click protection license#
They should improve on the visibility of the smart licensing mode so that it can indeed be smart and easier to use for the license renewal every year. Once you switch from the legacy mode to the smart licensing mode, you can't revert. At one point, I wanted to revert back to the legacy mode, but I can't revert. The process is not smooth, and I had to keep calling Cisco TAC to see how the issue can be resolved. I thought it would make licensing renewal seamless and very swift, but ever since I've switched to smart licensing, each time I want to renew my license, it is a whole lot of headache. There is a feature called smart licensing, and I switched from the legacy mode to the smart licensing mode because of what I thought smart licensing does. We normally renew our license every year. "The area of license renewal should be improved. It can analyze a lot of emails simultaneously, with no problems of capacity or system load." It has enabled us to configure some specific filters to stop emails that general configurations didn't stop. By removing a lot of that spam and phishing type emails, this allows them to do their job." "There is a huge return compared to if we didn't have a gateway appliance, as far as blocking malicious emails." "The solution is very configurable. We want to make our staff as productive as possible. We have a lot of clinical staff, being a hospital. That's a massive amount for our staff to deal with and probably several hours of their time. Previously, our users had to deal with nine million additional emails across the organization, which is nearly 1,000 emails per user to have to deal with a month.
and we also have the option to block Zero-day attacks." "Cisco Secure Email Cloud Gateway has allowed our users to be able to concentrate on the emails that they do receive.
The Microsoft solution tends to be pretty limited in how it allows some of that to be done." "Anti-Spam and Advanced Malware Protection are the most valuable features. It has ensured we don't have business email compromises, and it has also ensured that our brand Galaxy is unique all year round." "The filtering is definitely better at catching both spam and malicious messages, and there's a lot of extremely granular ability for setting up rules. It is doing what it was actually designed to do. The appliance has more security such as SDF, DKIM, DMARC, and encryption." "It is doing its work. It is more practical with access to most features that you can configure." "I love the Advanced Malware Protection feature. There are not a lot of bells and whistles.
So, this solution has the best of both worlds. For this, you need to go to a lower level where you have more power, like command line interface. There are a lot of things that you cannot handle on the graphic interface, like message filters. "It has an intuitive, clear graphical interface where you can deploy your policies and understand the overall flow.
0 kommentar(er)
